Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
Indian J Med Sci ; 2007 Sep; 61(9): 505-10
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-68263

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Varicocele is the most common cause of male infertility. The etiology and pathophysiology of varicocele are multifactorial. When low sperm counts are associated with varicocele, varicocelectomy can partially restore spermatogenesis and fertility. Few recent studies have reported that in some varicocele cases, there may be an associated genetic etiology. Presence of a genetic factor like azoospermia factor microdeletions may lead to irreversible spermatogenic arrest in these cases, but very few reports support these findings. However, it is still not understood why some cases improve after varicocelectomy and why some cases show no improvement in semen parameters postoperatively. AIM: It is important to distinguish varicocele cases from Yq microdeletions as these cases have irreversible testicular damage and thus carry a poor prognosis after varicocelectomy. SETTINGS: Research and Referral tertiary care hospital. Design: Prospective study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-two infertile men with varicocele were referred for Yq microdeletion analysis from the infertility clinic of AIIMS and Army Research and Referral Hospital. Genomic DNA was isolated from blood and polymerase chain reaction microdeletion screening was done in these cases to determine the presence or deletion of AZF loci. RESULTS: In this study 7 (9.7%) varicocele cases harbored Yq microdeletion. The sperm count in cases which harbored Yq microdeletion was significantly lower than in cases without Yq microdeletion. CONCLUSION: Varicocele cases with Yq microdeletion do not show improvement in semen parameters post-varicocelectomy. Detection of Yq microdeletion determines prognosis and future management in such cases.

2.
J Indian Med Assoc ; 2000 Aug; 98(8): 453-6, 460
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-99549

ABSTRACT

Noise has ill effects tagged to its definition; yet, even though pollution of the air, water and land in metropolitan India has attracted some recognition, little attention has been paid to noise pollution and its effects. Noise acts upon the body very much as other stresses do and so its effects are far reaching affecting not just hearing but other body functions too. This article tries to generate some interest and controversies on the subject to initiate more action on noise pollution.


Subject(s)
Female , Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced/epidemiology , Humans , Incidence , India , Male , Noise, Occupational/adverse effects , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Occupational Health , Research , Risk Assessment
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL